Phonics & Letter Learning
Why Do Embedded Picture Mnemonics Make Letter Sounds Easier to Learn?
The difference comes down to how much a child's brain has to juggle and how many ways it has to remember.
Putting the picture inside the letter gives the brain two ways to remember one thing, with less for the child to hold onto at once. A picture sitting next to a letter leaves the child to connect two separate images on their own, and the familiar picture often wins their attention over the unfamiliar letter.
The problem with the old way
A picture beside a letter is two things to remember.
Most alphabet tools place a picture next to the letter, like an apple beside a bare A. This means a child has to pay attention to two separate things, build a bridge between them, and remember the connection. The problem is that the familiar picture often grabs their attention, while the unfamiliar letter, the part they actually need to learn, quietly fades into the background.
Picture next to the letter
Two separate images. The child has to connect them and remember the link, while the familiar picture often steals the spotlight from the letter.
Picture inside the letter
One image. The link is already made, so attention stays on the letter’s shape while the picture carries the sound.
Why it works
Two ideas do most of the heavy lifting.
Two routes back to the sound
Think of the letter sound as a destination. A bare letter gives the child one road back to it: remembering which sound that unfamiliar shape represents.
An embedded picture mnemonic provides another route. The child can recognize the familiar object, remember its name, and use the first sound in that word to find the letter sound. At the same time, the picture reinforces the shape of the letter.
Both routes lead back to the same letter-sound connection. If the sound does not come to mind immediately from the letter alone, the picture can help the child find their way back.
Researchers call this dual coding. It means the child has more than one way to remember the same thing.
Less work to find the answer
Because the clues are connected in one meaningful design, the child does not have to work as hard to remember the sound or hold several separate pieces in mind while trying to link them together.
This matters because reading requires children to do more than recall one sound. To blend individual letters into a word, they must retrieve several letter sounds, hold them in order, and combine them smoothly. When less effort is spent searching for each individual sound, more attention is available for the harder task of putting those sounds together.
Researchers call this lower cognitive load. It means the brain has less mental work to manage at one time.
References
- Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2021). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 199–211). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333.020
- Ehri, L. C., Deffner, N. D., & Wilce, L. S. (1984). Pictorial mnemonics for phonics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(5), 880–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.5.880
- Evans, M. A., Saint-Aubin, J., & Landry, N. (2009). Letter names and alphabet book reading by senior kindergarteners: An eye movement study. Child Development, 80(6), 1824–1841. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01370.x
- Kalender, B. (2026). Enhancing letter recognition in first graders with embedded picture mnemonics: Insights from cognitive load and dual coding theories. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1726843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1726843
- Kennedy, T., & Cariveau, T. (2024). Picture-text compounds in early reading: A descriptive review. Behavior and Social Issues, 33(1), 322–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-023-00139-0
- Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295
- Sadoski, M., McTigue, E. M., & Paivio, A. (2012). A dual coding theoretical model of decoding in reading: Subsuming the LaBerge and Samuels model. Reading Psychology, 33(5), 465–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2011.557330
- Shmidman, A., & Ehri, L. C. (2010). Embedded picture mnemonics to learn letters. Scientific Studies of Reading, 14(2), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430903117492
See it in action
Phonic Forge
The embedded picture mnemonics from this article — built into a playful card game kids actually ask to play.
Explore Phonic ForgeBring picture-powered learning to your home, classroom, or therapy room.
Join our email list for updates, early access to new resources, and behind-the-scenes looks at the tools we are building to make the invisible visible.